Less and more. Not so much.
Dieter Rams is big at the moment. His ten principles of good design seemed to explode around the interweb when the new Vitsoe site launched. He’s been profiled by the V&A as part of last year’s Cold War Modern exhibition. And Apple can’t launch a single product without Jonathan Ive’s name being linked to Rams’ time at Braun.
Reflecting the moment, London’s Design Museum is now showing an exhibition profiling the design ethos of the man himself.

It’s a great exhibition and, as a fan of Rams’ work, it’s wonderful to be able to see so much of his work in one place. Certainly being able to see his designs as physical objects (rather than simply photos in a reference book or blog post) gives a different perspective and appreciation of what he managed to achieve in his time at Braun.
Scattered throughout exhibition are quotes from Rams. The first time that I read some of these I was slightly awe-struck at how much of his design ethos could be applied to service and interaction design:
A product must not claim features – more innovative, more efficient, of higher value – it does not have.
Whilst it’s great to get people excited about features coming tomorrow, those features aren’t a panacea for having a service that doesn’t work today. Transparency and honesty in design can go a long way in helping to create something useful for users from day one.
Because it is certainly unpleasant and tedious to be confronted day-in, day-out with products which are confusing, which literally get on our nerves, and with which we cannot relate.
Usability has always been a key part of interaction design, however, the ability to relate to the user is perhaps even more useful. It’s not just about designing something to be as simple as possible to use. It’s about being to empathise with the end user and knowing what their measure of simplicity is.
More can be found in Rams’ 10 principles of good design:
Good design is innovative.
Good design makes a product useful.
Good design is aesthetic.
Good design makes a product understandable.
Good design is unobtrusive.
Good design is honest.
Good design is long-lasting.
Good design is thorough down to the last detail.
Good design is environmentally friendly.
Good design is as little design as possible.
However, the more that I walked around the long, regimented lines of radios, stereos, shavers and kitchen appliances the more I felt that something was missing.
Passion.
Not passion for creating the most useful, honest and understandable products. But passion as a response to actually using a Braun appliance.
Yes, of course it’s great to have something that just works, that fits in your hand just so. That does everything you expect it to do. But that’s where these designs seem to end: they do everything you expect them to do and nothing more. Whilst that’s undoubtedly a big part of being honest, I can’t help but feel that there was something missing.
Going that little bit further. Surprise and delight the user. Don’t just be beautiful through utility, create passion by crafting an experience that quickens the breath just that little bit. The little intake that when you hear it you know that you’ve got someone hooked.

I know that several of my friends would dispute that Braun products don’t elicit a passionate response. One friend in particular purrs like a contented kitten at the thought of owning a T1000 World Receiver. Though I suspect that this response is heavily based upon what Rams’s work now represents rather than the experience of using such a design classic.
However, now more than ever, creating an experience that quickens the breath – whether it be a product or a service – may be the only way to creating brand loyalty and a relationship that lasts. After all, other than toothbrushes, who buys Braun now?

3 comments
Lovely post Isaac. While it seems clear that Ives has indeed garnered inspiration from Rams – perhaps he also recognised the lack of ‘surprise and delight’ in the original designs – and thus his genius at Apple has been in layering these extra elements into the already beautifully simple and honest aesthetic.
Thanks Justin. It would be interesting to see what Rams would have been like at designing products that have interfaces (Steve Jobs famous line about ‘people who are serious about software should make their own hardware’ is running through my head). I think Ives’s genius has also been in combining the physical with the interface. Using a scroll wheel iPod for the very time back in 2001 was absolutely a surprise and delight moment – a brilliant combination of software and hardware. It’s difficult to see how one could be achieved without the other.
I think the startling thing about Rams’s work is to appreciate the environment and time in which he was doing his work. I remember our discussion whilst walking round the exhibition at the Design Museum that the whole thing lacked context. How about showing the viewer record players and radios from contemporary manufacturers to see how far ahead he was with his designs?
Never having actually felt the tuning mechanism on a T1000 I don’t actually know if it is a beautifully ‘damped’ and weighted as, say, a Tivoli radio dial is.
To look inside one of his creations, you realise how far ahead the exterior was compared to the myriad of wires, valves and general chunkiness of the innards.
The fact that manufacturing processes and technology has moved on sufficiently to allow complete control over entire products such as we see coming from the Ive stable is a good thing. It allows ‘us’ to create beautifully complete products with the surprise and delight that you talk about.
(Oh yeah, I am the purring kitten Isaac mentions)