Objectified: giving objects memories

This time last year I was deep in third year project stress at university.  Given the guideline that we could do ‘anything’ there was initially quite a bit of mental flailing.  Finally however, I landed on an area of personal interest – memory, what it means to us and how it is changing in the digital age.

Why memory?

Memory maketh the man – we are who we are thanks to our experiences.  They’re sometimes comforting, sad, traumatic and always make good anecdotes.  We obviously don’t carry all our memories in crystal clear form around in our head, but they’re there, lurking – all they need is a trigger to bring them out.

The old cliches of the smell of fresh cut grass awakening memories of never-ending, hot summer days or a song unleashing a flood of emotions about a long lost love are all true.  Sights, sounds, touch, smells are all powerful triggers for the mind.

Digital effects

More and more of these triggers are becoming digitised – Facebook albums, Youtube videos, blogs, libraries of music, the list goes on.  A simmering, unorganised mass of triggers, clues and  stimuli to wade through.  Brains remember all (in theory anyway), they just need the right trigger, the key to unlock a memory.  In the digital world, there is no focus to these, no way in except clicking aimlessly through Facebook albums and waiting for whatever memory hits first.

The project

Possessing a bad memory and an unshaken belief in the good of tech (Skynet aside…), I looked to technology to provide solutions to help my brain out.  This combined with a passing interest in my roots, vintage possessions and a childhood visiting too many museums, led to the first seeds of an idea.  Using objects as a trigger point for memories.  An idea I ran with to try and create something that would benefit not just me, but have real utility for a community of users and have the ability to grow and adapt to suit their needs.

This semi-lengthy quote sums my project up better than I ever could now, many months after the event!  It comes from a paper written jointly by me and my supervisor about my project and submitted to the International Symposium on VAST (Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage):

The study of material culture provides complex models on how people interact with objects. Objects or artefacts often symbolise something more than their intrinsic nature, and this is often preserved over the years, giving future generations an appreciation and a sense of value that has evolved through time. Through personal association objects gain subjective meaning based on the memories that we have of them but such memories are generally hidden and intangible.

We present a way of storing associated memories with objects. By using RFID tags, objects can be linked to a database containing basic metadata about the object. To this is added personal memories of the owner in such forms as video, images, text, or voice, and these are visualised by calculating the importance to the owner. This is then extended further via social networking so that the owner’s personal set of memories can be linked to those of other people, allowing multiple objects and memories to be explored. By exploiting the links between objects and memories, a unique connection is formed between the physical and virtual worlds, connecting a tactile object to a wealth of virtual information.

Memories can be re-visited by reading the RFID tag, which will then allow for all the associated information about it to be viewed and explored. The system is suited both to personal users who wish to catalogue and research their possessions, and to the cultural heritage sector – as a way of tracking, cataloging and exploring museum pieces, or as a means of recording and displaying feedback from those who interact with the artefacts today.

In short -
To organise an unstructured world, there needs to be a way to sort, a way to find the relevant and discard the rest. A way in and guide through the mess – my chosen way in was physical objects.

Memories make objects become alive, making them more interesting, more relevant and imbued with meaning.  Recording these memories online (whether by aggregating pre-existing content or inserting it manually) and linking the object uniquely with it, means an object can act as a key to virtual groups of memories.

Every individual that interacts with a object adds their own interpretation and meaning.  The interlinking of these memories and views give the object a new identity, a “soul” almost, something that sums up the essence of an object.  The object ceases to simply be a thing but becomes something of significance.

This is an area with huge potential, both with personal and cultural implications.  How it can allow us to “see history” and help us remember.  It’s also one that can only improve as technology does – with the addition of augmented reality, NFC, object recognition and things that haven’t even been imagined yet.

Is that it?

This touches on just a tiny portion of what I find interesting – the frankly huge areas of emotion and memory and how technology interacts with these.  The “girly” side of technology if you will…exploring the wooly areas of emotion and feeling.  Areas we don’t yet fully understand in psychological terms, let alone in how how the digital world is aiding, hindering, changing and evolving them.
In other words: expect to see more blog posts from me on the topic.  Likely including a part 2 to this, exploring project findings, impact, questions it raised and just why I think it’s an area with huge potential…

Other interesting (semi) related things…

BBC – A history of our world – telling a history of our world with objectshttp://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld – Fantastic interactive site exploring historical artifacts and what they mean to people.  Especially love the idea of making history by adding in your own object, although they do appear to be of historical rather than personal importance.

The disposable memory project – leaving disposable cameras around the world, and telling their storyhttp://disposablememoryproject.org – This taps in nicely to the idea of each individual adding their own story to an object, even if in a literal sense here.

Hitotoki – Project collecting stories of singular experiences tied to citieshttp://hitotoki.org/london/ – Linking memories of places to maps in an online setting,  Exploring subjective memories in the public space.

17 comments

Author: Kate Pickering Kate Pickering

Hi Tara

Really interesting blog post. I too have been interested in this topic and loved the possibilities that could arise from marrying memories with digital objects.

I’m not sure if you have heard of her at all but I would suggest looking at Jayne Wallace: http://www.digitaljewellery.com Her work is very much based around your same theories.

http://www.digitaljewellery.com

I will continue to follow your blog and look forward to the next post.


Kate :)

Author: Justin McMurray JuzMcMuz

Fascinating exploration Tara. I imagine an object – some personal artefact like a childhood book – being digitally brimming full of digitised memories which I can unlock at a press of a button (or a thought). Brilliant. Looking forward to part 2… the actual product of your efforts!

Author: Elin Elin

Yes, me too! Really want to know more. Your point about memories being triggered by ‘trigger points’ made me think about search engines… imagine if we could have a ‘personal google’ that followed us since we were born and understood our ‘trigger points”…

Author: Edd Bagenal Edd Bagenal

Great reading this having talked to you about it in its formulation. Are you one of the Many Makers now?
Edd


Author: mike mike

Great stuff Tara, looking forward to more.

Author: tara tara

Thanks Kate. I hadn’t heard of Jayne Wallace’s work before, but looking through it now it looks very interesting. I love the combination of jewellery and digital, as for me personally, jewellery is the thing that tends to retain most significance.

Definitely been given some food for thought and will be following her work, thank you!

Author: tara tara

It was good to re-examine it again – it’s been a while since I last explored it. Thank you for all your help on it!

And yes, I am indeed one of the Many now.

Author: Leo Leo

Have you come accross “social object theory” – bit different in what it is focused on but another way of putting objects at the heart of conversations…

L

Author: tara tara

I must admit I don’t know much about social object theory, but having just had a quick Google…I’m intrigued!

Would be great if you could recommend any interesting articles/blog posts around the subject?

Author: tara tara

Ah yes, the dreaded Spimes…. I did read “Shaping Things” as part of the research for the project but I’m not sure how much has remained in my brain.

I do like his way of thinking about technology, it fits in nicely with my “I’ll rather be in a sci-fi” film state of mind so I should definitely read more of his work. The “blobject” area looks an interesting place to start…

Author: tara tara

I love that idea! A “personal google” that backs up all our experiences for us so we can access them at any time.

It’s interesting to think what effect that would have on humans culturally and personally. After all, how important is forgetting to our mental well being!? It certainly helps avoid trauma, but then we also forget things that may be important to us. I guess we just have to wait until technology catches up to find out…

Author: Sara Williams saradotdub

Really thought-provoking post, Tara.

I suppose we traditionally see memories as attached to people, but triggered by objects and experiences. Every once in a while I come across something that turns this on its head and regards the object as the thing memories belong to. The book Accordion Crimes by Annie Proulx is one example, but in that case the memories are locked inside the object and only shared with the reader.

It would be kind of mind-blowing if technology could facilitate objects owning — and sharing — memories. Can you imagine how that would affect the way we learn, or the way we conduct societies, or even just practice being human? I mean, it’s hard to imagine rushing into conflict when the very ground beneath your feet is bleeding real, feelable memories of the last war, isn’t it?

Bit of a head-spinner. Very interesting area!

Author: tara tara

I really like that imagery there of the environment oozing memories and experiences to us (I like a nice bit of imagery!). I agree that if technology could provide that it would be incredibly powerful and really challenge perceptions.

This area raises so many questions about what we should/want to remember and how important it is for us to forget. If objects/places begin to remember for us, then we lose the ability to discard traumatic memories. However, if people could experience what we experienced it could be a way of understanding each other far better.

I think another fascinating aspect of this is how memories form the basis of history. History is usually inherently biased and usually written based on the subjective memory of a few people. If the very environment that an activity took place in could tell us precisely what went on based on the memories of every participant, that would really shake up how we and future generations see events.

Comments on this post have definitely given me a lot more food for thought, ooh and I’ll have to check out that book, it sounds interesting!

Author: Jon Fein Jon Fein

I find the RFID idea intriguing. I’ve been working on the Objects and Memory Project for eight years. It is a look at who we are though the otherwise ordinary things that we imbue with meaning. The Objects and Memory documentary film was broadcast nationally in the US on PBS and DVDs are available; contact me through http://www.objectsandmemory.org. Especially during these tough economic times, thinking about what is valuable to us helps renew a sense of purpose and direction. We care most about what is, for us, irreplaceable, and the connection of story and object is vital. James E. Young has written about memory triggers, or “seeds of memory”, as he puts it. I continue to explore this aspect of our humanity and look forward to seeing how your application of digital technology develops.

http://www.objectsandmemory.org

Author: Matthew Matthew

Hi Tara

Really interesting article – the idea of imbuing objects with some ability to share its own memory of interactions with people is a fascinating one – something explored in scifi and fantasy literature. Whether the object remains objective, or not, is another question.

Thanks for the link to the Disposable Memory Project too!

Author: chris ford chris ford

Interesting article Tara…found it by a random google search. I’m currently writing my MA (Photography) thesis on Ojects, Memory & Meaning. Do you mind if I cite you?

Tweet this